March 21, 2017

Uncharted Depths: Exploring the Marianas with SuBastian

  • (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)
  • SOI's new ROV is a powerful tool to help scientists discover the secrets housed within the ocean deep (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)
  • Inside the control room (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)
  • (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)
  • (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)
  • SuBastian goes to work (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)
  • SuBastian prepares to take a chimney sample (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)
  • (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute) (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)
  • SOI's new ROV is a powerful tool to help scientists discover the secrets housed within the ocean deep (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute) SOI's new ROV is a powerful tool to help scientists discover the secrets housed within the ocean deep (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)
  • Inside the control room (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute) Inside the control room (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)
  • (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute) (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)
  • (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute) (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)
  • SuBastian goes to work (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute) SuBastian goes to work (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)
  • SuBastian prepares to take a chimney sample (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute) SuBastian prepares to take a chimney sample (Photo: Schmidt Ocean Institute)

A crescent shaped scar on the earth’s crust marks the location of the deepest known part of the world’s ocean. 

 
With some areas reaching depths more than 36,000 feet, scientists rely on a range of pioneering deep-sea technologies to survey the unexplored regions of the Mariana Trench. In 1987, the submersible Alvin was the first to visit the nearby Mariana Back-arc, a zone of highly active submarine volcanism and hydrothermal vents hidden 13,000 feet below the ocean’s surface. After returning to the Back-arc 30 years later equipped with the Schmidt Ocean Institute’s new underwater vehicle SuBastian, scientists can now fill gaps in our understanding about the biogeography of these unique ecosystems and to identify possible new species thriving in this extreme deep-ocean environment. 
 
Volcanic Zones - Mariana Region
The Mariana region is home to a subduction system – the site of collision between two of the planet’s tectonic plates. As a result, the area is made up of the three parts; the deep Mariana Trench, shallow to mid-depth Volcanic Arc, and mid-depth to deep spreading Mariana Back-arc. Dr. William Chadwick from NOAA-PMEL and Oregon State University, explained what happens at these sites, “In some subduction zones, including the Mariana system, the over-riding plate is under tension, and as a result, it has developed a back-arc spreading center where it is actually splitting apart along a north-south line. Volcanic activity is concentrated along the zone of spreading, where it creates new ocean crust.” 
 
This tectonic environment is unlike anywhere else on earth, providing a range of geophysical and geochemical conditions for chemosynthetic organisms, and supporting a surprisingly diverse biological community on the seafloor.
 
In the Mariana region, only the Volcanic Arc has been systematically explored for hydrothermal vents. Scientists discovered 20 hydrothermally active seamounts and more than 20 new species exclusive to the area. Yet, more than 600 km of the Mariana Back-arc still remain uncharted. 
 
“From the previous exploration, we know that about a third of the seamounts in the Mariana Volcanic Arc are hydrothermally active, but the Mariana Back-arc has never been systematically explored, so we know much less about the activity there. How many hydrothermal vent sites are there in the Mariana Back-arc? Where are they located? What is their chemical input into the ocean? What is their role in the biogeography of vent animals in the western Pacific? Do the different tectonic settings of the Arc and Back-arc affect the character of the vents they host? We should now have the answers to some of these questions, and a starting point for answering the rest,” said Chadwick.
 
Exploring the Back-arc
The first phase of the two-part exploration of the region took place in December 2015 onboard research vessel Falkor. Principal Investigator Joseph Resing, of the University of Washington, led a 27-day mission to the Back-arc with researchers from the University of Washington, Oregon State University and NOAA-PMEL. A vital member of the team was the autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV), Sentry.
 
The Sentry AUV carried instrument packages consisting of optical and chemical sensors and surveyed systematically for hydrothermally active areas. Three new hydrothermal vent sites were discovered, one being the third deepest in the world. 
 
“At the end of the first expedition, we knew there were vent sites on the seafloor, but we had little or no information about what the sites looked like, what animals lived there or the chemical character of the vents. For that, we needed an ROV,” explained Dr. David Butterfield, JISAO, University of Washington, who led the return journey in 2016, along with Dr. William Chadwick, as part of the second phase for the Back-arc mission.
 
The multidisciplinary team of leading geologists, chemists and biologists aboard Falkor returned with the new 4,500 m capable remotely operated vehicle (ROV) SuBastian, to visually explore and sample the vent sites discovered during the previous cruise.
 
Chadwick said, “The primary goal was to locate the new hydrothermal vents on the seafloor and to characterize the geology, chemistry of the fluids and the biological communities at the vents. We were exploring a large part of the Mariana Back-arc that had not been explored before, so these are the first observations. We also want to put these new discoveries into the context of what was previously known.”
 
The data collected during the first phase was used to create a map of the area. Now, scientists will combine the map with biodiversity data collected during the recent cruise to better define the relationships between geologic setting, chemical environment and biological communities. 
 
The New ROV SuBastian
The return to the Back-arc was the debut scientific mission for the newly built ROV SuBastian. SuBastian was outfitted with a suite of sensors and scientific equipment to support scientific data and sample collection, as well as several cameras, including a high definition 4K video camera. 
 
The Schmidt Ocean Institute was eager to give SuBastian and Falkor the capability to stream live footage on YouTube, sharing the experience and data, with the entire scientific community as well as the public. The organization believes that open sharing of information is critical to advancing the pace of science forward. As such, they plan to live-stream all ROV dives in perpetuity so these videos can be used as a data set. Students also have access to videos in the classroom through a newly developed lesson plan to learn how to do scientific video annotation.
 
Life among Submarine Volcanoes
It took two hours for SuBastian to reach the Back-arc seafloor at depths greater than 3,500 m. On arrival at the new vent sites scientists, along with a YouTube audience of millions, discovered spectacular chimneys made of sulfide minerals, some up to 30 meters (100 feet) tall, and hot fluid gushing out at temperatures up to 365°C (690°F).
 
The chimneys were covered with a range of animals, including “hairy snails”, shrimp, crabs, mussels, limpets, squat lobsters, anemones and polychaete worms, some thought to be newly discovered. Although the vents are separated by long distances up to 100 miles, these new observations suggest that the Back-arc sites are long-lived and have biological “connectivity” between each location. “One of the main discoveries was that all the known Back-arc sites in the Marianas have the same animal species, and many of them are endemic – they are found nowhere else on the planet! That means they evolved into distinct species in the Back-arc and are specifically adapted to that environment,” said Chadwick, “Biological connectivity means that since we find the same animals at all the Back-arc sites that they must be able to disperse and colonize between sites, since the vent sites come and go. This is amazing, but apparently, occurs through the release of larvae that are carried by ocean currents to new sites. This is somewhat like plants dispersing thousands of seeds out over water, and only a few of them eventually finding an island where they can grow. Vent site habitats are like islands of chemosynthetic energy distributed along the volcanic features of the deep sea.”
 
The study also confirmed that the Back-arc ecosystems are distinct and different from the nearby Volcanic Arc hydrothermal ecosystems, perhaps supporting the idea that geological and chemical environment play a key role in selecting animal community composition at hydrothermal vents. 
 
Chadwick described a possible explanation behind their observations, “The vent animals are adapted to very specific conditions – probably related to the chemical environment that they need to survive. For example, we now know that there are different but related species in the Volcanic Arc and Back-arc environments in the Mariana region. The Arc and Back-arc have very different chemical environments at their hydrothermal vents due to their very different geology. And likewise, they have different, but related, species living at the vents. It might be that a species from the Arc, does not – cannot – live at a Back-arc vent site, and vice versa. In this way, the chemical setting determines the biological community.”
 
The research team believes this hypothesis is the most likely explanation behind their observations of the unique Back-arc ecosystem. Butterfield explained that there is an alternative, “A competing hypothesis is that the great separation in depth between shallow arc sites and deep Back-arc sites prevents the exchange of larvae between the two environments, so their fauna has diverged over evolutionary time, and the sites are no longer connected by larval transport pathways.”
 
“We don’t know for sure that Back-arc species could not survive in an Arc environment, and vice versa. That requires more experimentation on the physiology of vent animals and the range of habitat conditions larvae can tolerate. That is partly why we undertook this expedition: to make the observations and collect the samples to identify precisely what animals are living in each environment, and characterize the range of chemical conditions is in each of the habitats where those animals are found.”
 
Throughout 2017, the team will continue to analyze the data and samples collected during the most recent expedition with hopes to advance research on how life thrives on these extreme deep-sea hydrothermal vents. 
 
“We’ll be analyzing the data and samples collected during the cruise for many months and probably years, then we’ll be using those data to write scientific papers to share the results of our research with the broader scientific community and to the public. Eventually, this may lead to new questions and new research in the Mariana region,” Chadwick concluded.
 
 
Controlling SuBastian
SuBastian runs on 100 percent Greensea controls, including the OPENSEA operating platform, and in its first science dive had .005% downtime on over 200 hours subsea. Greensea has been included on all of SuBastian’s dives so far, and the company recently signed a deal to support SOI’s work in 2017.
 
Core Software System 
•Greensea OPENSEA operating platform
 
Vehicle Control System Software
•Greensea Balefire Vehicle Positioning/Autopilots
•Greensea Balefire Automated Positioning
•Greensea Balefire Sonar Positioning
 
Operator Interface
•Greensea Workspace Mission View
•Greensea Workspace Integrated Video View
•Greensea Workspace Integrated Sonar View with Target Tracking
 
ROV Control & Telemetry Hardware
•Greensea Custom Design and Build
 

Acknowledgements
- Dr. William Chadwick, NOAA-PMEL and Oregon State University.
- Dr. David Butterfield, NOAA-PMEL and University of Washington
- The Schmidt Ocean Institute
- This research was supported by the NOAA Ocean Exploration and Research Program, NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Lab, the NOAA Pacific Islands Regional Office, and the Schmidt Ocean Institute
 
 
(As published in the March 2017 edition of Marine Technology Reporter)
WashingtonNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationOregon State University