Greater CO2 Uptake Could Cause Ocean Deoxygenation
Methods to enhance the ocean’s uptake of carbon dioxide (CO₂) are being explored to help tackle the climate crisis. However, some of these approaches could significantly exacerbate ocean deoxygenation.
Their potential impact on marine oxygen must therefore be systematically considered when assessing their suitability, according to an international team of researchers led by Prof. Dr Andreas Oschlies from the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel.
Global warming is the primary cause of the dramatic loss of oxygen in the ocean — approximately two percent of the ocean’s oxygen inventory has been lost over the past decades, and additional warming will lead to additional oxygen loss.
The new study reveals that many proposed marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) methods – especially those based on biological processes – could intensify this oxygen loss.
“What helps the climate is not automatically good for the ocean,” says Oschlies. Together with an international team that is part of the UNESCO Global Ocean Oxygen Network (GO2NE), he conducted a comprehensive assessment using idealized global model simulations to analyze both the direct impacts of various mCDR approaches on ocean oxygen and their indirect effects through climate mitigation. The results have now been published in Environmental Research Letters.
The study identifies several biotic mCDR methods as particularly critical — including ocean fertilization, large-scale macroalgae farming followed by sinking of the biomass and artificial upwelling of nutrient-rich deep water. These approaches involve the enhancement of photosynthetic biomass production, followed by its decomposition in the ocean interior. This re-mineralization process consumes oxygen — at levels comparable to the current rate of global deoxygenation caused by ocean warming.
“Methods that increase biomass production in the ocean, and subsequently lead to oxygen-consuming decomposition, cannot be considered harmless climate solutions,” says Oschlies. “Our model simulations show that such approaches could cause a decrease in dissolved oxygen that is four to 40 times greater than the oxygen gain expected from reduced global warming.”
By contrast, geochemical mCDR approaches that do not involve nutrient input – such as ocean alkalinity enhancement through the addition of alkaline substances based on limestone – appear to have minimal effects on ocean oxygen levels and are comparable to simply reducing CO₂ emissions.
Among all methods examined, only large-scale macroalgae farming with biomass harvesting (i.e. removal from the ocean) resulted in an overall increase in oceanic oxygen levels. In this case, no additional oxygen is consumed within the marine environment, and the removal of nutrients limits oxygen consumption elsewhere.
Model results suggest that if deployed at sufficient scale, this approach could even reverse past oxygen losses — providing up to 10 times more oxygen than has been lost due to climate change within a century. However, here it is the removal of nutrients that would negatively impact biological productivity in the ocean.
Given these findings, the authors advocate for mandatory inclusion of oxygen measurements in all future mCDR research and deployment efforts.
“The ocean is a complex system which is already heavily under pressure,” says Oschlies. “If we intervene with large-scale measures, we must ensure that, no matter how good our intentions are, we are not further threatening marine environmental conditions that marine life depends on.”